Podcast thumbnail

The Art of Asking: Getting What You Need to Grow

8 min
4.7

Golden Hook & Introduction

SECTION

Nova: What if I told you that the best way to get honest feedback on your idea is to never talk about your idea at all?

Atlas: Whoa, wait a second. That sounds like something out of a spy novel, not a business strategy meeting. Never talk about it? How does that even work?

Nova: Well, it works precisely because of human nature, Atlas. Most people, especially those close to you, want to be polite. They want to encourage you. And that desire to please often means they'll tell you what they you want to hear, not what you to know.

Atlas: Oh, I know that feeling. The enthusiastic nods, the "Yeah, that sounds great!" – only to realize later you've been building a product in a vacuum. It’s like everyone’s trying to be your biggest fan, and you’re just soaking it up.

Nova: Exactly! And today, we're unraveling this very dilemma in "The Art of Asking: Getting What You Need to Grow." We're drawing heavily from Rob Fitzpatrick's cult classic, "The Mom Test." It's a book born from his own painful experiences building startups and realizing traditional feedback was utterly useless. He learned the hard way that if you ask your mom if your business idea is good, she'll probably say yes, even if it's terrible.

Atlas: So we're talking about getting what you to grow, not just what you to hear. That's a crucial distinction. It’s about cutting through the noise.

Nova: Precisely. And that takes us straight into our first core idea: understanding why traditional feedback often misses the mark, and how to get past those polite affirmations to find the real truth.

The 'Mom Test' Principle: Beyond Politeness to Truth

SECTION

Nova: Think about it, Atlas. When you're excited about an idea, you implicitly want validation. And the person you're talking to senses that. They don't want to burst your bubble. So, they give you vague encouragement, hypothetical praise, or even outright leading statements.

Atlas: But isn't some feedback better than none? How do you even know if it's "bad" feedback when you're getting it? It all sounds so positive in the moment.

Nova: That's the insidious part! It feels good, but it's utterly useless. Let me paint a picture. Imagine an aspiring entrepreneur, let's call him Alex. Alex has this brilliant idea for an app that helps you organize your sock drawer using AI. He's passionate, he's spent weeks sketching wireframes, and he goes to his friends and family.

Atlas: Oh no, I can already see where this is going.

Nova: "Hey Mom, I'm building this amazing AI sock-organizing app! Don't you think that's a great idea?" His mom, beaming, says, "Oh, Alex, that sounds! You're so clever, darling!" His friends say, "Dude, that's wild, imagine never losing a sock again!" Everyone is overwhelmingly positive. Alex feels validated, pumps more time and money into development, only to launch it to crickets. Because no one actually needed an AI sock organizer.

Atlas: Ugh, that's a painful visual. It’s like they were cheering him on, but for a race he shouldn't have been running in the first place. So, if I can't ask about my idea directly, what I ask? How do I get to the real underlying problem without leading them down a path to validate my solution?

Nova: That's where Fitzpatrick's brilliance shines through. The core rule of "The Mom Test" is simple: Never ask people about your idea. Instead, ask about their past behavior and their problems. You're trying to uncover existing pain, not validate a proposed solution. So, instead of, "Would you use an AI sock organizer?", you ask, "When was the last time you struggled to find a matching pair of socks?" Or "What did you do then?"

Atlas: Ah, so it's about uncovering existing pain points, not validating a solution. That makes so much sense, like being a detective for unmet needs. You’re not saying, "Here's my answer, is it good?" You’re saying, "Tell me about your question."

Nova: Exactly! You're listening for real, concrete past actions and frustrations. If someone says, "Oh, I just buy new socks every month," or "I actually love mismatched socks," you've got your answer. It's not about them liking or disliking idea, it's about whether the problem even exists for them in a meaningful way. You become an anthropologist, observing and listening for genuine human behavior, not hypothetical desires.

Structured Inquiry: Crafting Questions for Deeper Understanding

SECTION

Nova: Understanding we get bad feedback is one thing, but do we systematically get good feedback, especially when we're trying to reach a larger audience? This is where Ryan Levesque's "Ask" method comes in, offering a structured approach to questioning.

Atlas: Okay, so the Mom Test is great for one-on-one conversations. You're sitting across from someone, reading their body language, digging into their past. But what about scaling that insight? How do you apply that detective work to hundreds or thousands of potential customers, particularly in an online world?

Nova: That's the gap Levesque fills. His method, often used in online surveys, focuses on asking a series of open-ended questions designed to segment your audience by their biggest challenges, desires, and even their level of sophistication. He calls it a "Deep Dive Survey." The magic is in the sequence. You start broad, asking about their single biggest challenge, and then you follow up.

Atlas: So it's not just "what do you want?", but "tell me about your biggest frustration with X" and then "what have you already tried?" – almost like a funnel for their pain points, getting them to reveal more and more as they go along?

Nova: Precisely. Levesque introduces this concept of "micro-commitments." As people answer more questions, they're investing more time and thought, making their subsequent answers more honest and detailed. For instance, imagine a fitness coach. Instead of asking "Would you buy a new workout program?", they'd ask, "What's your biggest struggle with staying healthy right now?"

Atlas: That's a brilliant shift. The first question gets a generic "maybe." The second gets you specific dietary issues, or time constraints, or motivation problems.

Nova: Exactly. And then they might follow up with, "What have you tried in the past to overcome that struggle, and what happened?" This reveals what hasn't worked, what they're resistant to, and ultimately, what kind of solution they might actually be open to. This structured approach allows you to group people not just by demographics, but by their actual, deeply felt needs. You build products and services that truly resonate because they're addressing identified pain points.

Atlas: It feels like "The Mom Test" is about honesty and "Ask" is about precision. One gets you the truth in a qualitative, conversational way, the other helps you categorize and quantify that truth for product development and market segmentation. They really do complement each other.

Nova: Absolutely. The Mom Test helps you validate if a problem truly exists and if people care enough to act on it. Levesque's "Ask" then helps you understand the nuances of that problem across a larger audience, allowing you to tailor your solution to specific segments. It's about moving from anecdotal truth to scalable, actionable insights.

Synthesis & Takeaways

SECTION

Nova: Ultimately, both Fitzpatrick and Levesque are teaching us to be better listeners, to move past our own assumptions and truly understand the world from another person's perspective. It's a profound shift from 'telling' to 'asking,' and from 'assuming' to 'understanding.'

Atlas: It's not just about products, is it? It’s about better relationships, better communication, even self-understanding. By asking better questions, we're not just growing our ideas, we're growing ourselves, gaining a clearer lens through which to view the world and our place in it.

Nova: That's beautifully put. And the tiny step for our listeners, straight from the wisdom of these books, is this: Before your next conversation about an idea, prepare three questions focused on the other person's past experiences and challenges, not your solution. Just three.

Atlas: Don't ask if they use it; ask if they used something similar, and what they loved or hated about it. It forces you to listen, really listen, for the echoes of genuine need.

Nova: It's about shifting from validating our ego to validating real human needs. A powerful lesson for anyone looking to truly make an impact, whether that's with a new product, a new project, or just a deeper conversation.

Nova: This is Aibrary.

Atlas: Congratulations on your growth!

00:00/00:00