
How Great Companies Bring Dignity, Pay & Meaning to Everyone’s Work
11 minIntroduction
Narrator: In 2015, the call centers for Quest Diagnostics, a major clinical laboratory, were in a state of crisis. Two years prior, the company had consolidated twenty regional centers into two massive hubs, a move designed to slash costs. But the reality was a disaster. Employee turnover was a staggering 34%, absenteeism was rampant, and the centers were chronically understaffed. Supervisors, instead of coaching, spent their days handling furious customers whose calls were escalated by undertrained, overwhelmed representatives. The poor service was so bad that doctors, fed up with patient complaints, were switching to competing labs. Quest was trapped in a self-defeating loop: in an attempt to save money on labor, it was hemorrhaging money through operational chaos and lost business.
This scenario, a vicious cycle of low investment leading to poor performance, is the central problem explored in Zeynep Ton’s book, How Great Companies Bring Dignity, Pay & Meaning to Everyone’s Work. Ton argues that this is not an isolated failure but a widespread, accepted business strategy—and that a more profitable, humane, and competitive alternative exists.
The Vicious Cycle of Bad Jobs Is a Systemic Failure
Key Insight 1
Narrator: Many companies, particularly in retail and service industries, operate under what Ton calls the "bad jobs strategy." They view employees as a cost to be minimized, leading to low wages, unstable schedules, and minimal training. The predictable result is high employee turnover. This isn't just a human resources problem; it's a ruinous operational one.
The story of Home Depot under former CEO Bob Nardelli serves as a powerful example. When Nardelli took over in 2000, he brought a cost-cutting philosophy from his time at General Electric. He drastically reduced the number of full-time employees and cut overall staffing levels. While profits rose in the short term, the company’s legendary customer service collapsed. Experienced employees left, replaced by a revolving door of new hires who couldn't help customers with complex projects. As co-founder Arthur Blank later observed, the cuts reduced sales, which led to more labor cuts, which further reduced sales. The company became trapped in a vicious cycle where its attempts to save money actively destroyed its value proposition. Ton argues this isn't just bad luck; it's the inevitable outcome of a system that treats its most valuable asset—its people—as its biggest liability.
The Dangerous Myths of Market Wages and Worker Worth
Key Insight 2
Narrator: A common defense for low pay is that companies are simply paying the "market wage." But Ton dismantles this logic, showing it's often a justification for paying people less than they need to live. In 2017, PayPal CEO Dan Schulman was proud that his company paid at or above market rates. He was shocked to discover that many of his call center employees were so financially strapped they were relying on local soup kitchens and payday loans to get by. The "market wage" was not a living wage. This realization prompted PayPal to launch a massive financial wellness initiative, raising pay, lowering healthcare costs, and granting stock to its lowest-paid workers, understanding that financial stress directly impacts performance.
A related myth is that some jobs, and the people who do them, simply aren't "worth" more. The book counters this with the remarkable story of the NUMMI auto plant. In 1982, a General Motors plant in Fremont, California, was shut down, having earned the reputation as the "worst workforce" in the American auto industry. A year later, it reopened as a joint venture with Toyota. Toyota rehired 85% of the same "terrible" workers but implemented its own system of management, which was built on respect, training, and empowerment. Within two years, the plant became one of the most productive in the country. The workers hadn't changed; the system had. Ton uses this to prove that a worker's value isn't fixed—it is a direct function of the job's design and the support system around them.
The Five Corporate Disabilities of Mediocrity
Key Insight 3
Narrator: Companies stuck in the vicious cycle develop what Ton calls "corporate disabilities"—systemic weaknesses that make it nearly impossible to improve. These disabilities are:
- Inability to Hire and Train: Constant understaffing and firefighting means managers have no time for proper hiring or training, so they hire anyone who can start tomorrow. 2. Inability to Empower: Because employees are poorly selected and trained, management doesn't trust them, leading to rigid, top-down control that stifles initiative. 3. Inability to Match Labor with Demand: These companies either cut staff to save money, leaving them unable to serve customers, or they add complexity (like Starbucks’ infamous Unicorn Frappuccino) without adding resources, burning out their employees. 4. Inability to Develop Strong Managers: Unit managers in this system are overworked and overwhelmed, leading to high burnout and turnover in this critical role. 5. Inability to Have High Expectations: Because the system is so broken, management can't expect excellence from employees, and employees can't expect support from management.
A story from a senior living facility illustrates this perfectly. To meet financial targets, the facility began accepting high-acuity residents with serious medical needs. However, they didn't add staff or provide new training. The existing caretakers were overwhelmed, mistakes and injuries increased, and the care for all residents declined. The system's inability to match labor with demand created a cascade of failures, making the entire operation less competitive and less humane.
Overcoming the Leadership Barrier of Fear, Doubt, and Flawed Data
Key Insight 4
Narrator: If the good jobs strategy is so effective, why don't more leaders adopt it? Ton argues it comes down to fear, doubt, and a lack of imagination, often reinforced by a flawed reliance on data. Leaders in a mediocre system, when asked to justify raising wages, will look at historical data. But that data, from a broken system, will inevitably "prove" that past pay raises had little effect on performance.
One company’s analytics team found that a previous pay increase had only a tiny impact on turnover. The conclusion? "We are not a company that tends to make bets on its people." They failed to see that raising pay in isolation, without fixing the underlying operational problems, is destined to fail. Leaders also express fear of looking naive or being accused of "running a charity." This mindset is a trap. It takes courage and conviction for a leader to make a leap of faith, recognizing that investing in people is not a cost but the fundamental driver of a healthy, adaptable business.
The Good Jobs System: A Virtuous Cycle of Investment and Operational Excellence
Key Insight 5
Narrator: The alternative to the vicious cycle is the "good jobs system," which combines investment in people with four key operational choices. This creates a virtuous cycle where motivated, capable employees drive superior performance, which in turn funds further investment. The four choices are:
- Focus and Simplify: Do fewer things, but do them exceptionally well. Eliminate tasks and offerings that don't add significant customer value. 2. Standardize and Empower: Standardize routine work to reduce cognitive load, then empower employees to handle exceptions and improve the system. 3. Cross-Train: Teach employees multiple skills so they can help customers more effectively and cover for one another, creating a more flexible workforce. 4. Operate with Slack: Staff stores and centers with slightly more labor than the expected workload. This "slack" gives employees time to serve customers well, keep the store clean, and contribute to improvements, rather than constantly rushing.
The turnaround of Sam's Club under CEO John Furner is a testament to this system. In 2017, the retailer was struggling. Furner made a bold bet: he significantly raised pay for key roles and simultaneously simplified operations. His team cut thousands of products to reduce clutter, streamlined communications from corporate, and introduced technology to make work easier. The results were stunning. Employee turnover fell, customer satisfaction soared, and sales grew by $15 billion in two years without opening new stores.
Conclusion
Narrator: The single most important takeaway from How Great Companies Bring Dignity, Pay & Meaning to Everyone’s Work is that investing in frontline employees is not an act of charity, but the most intelligent operational strategy for long-term success. The prevailing business orthodoxy, with its obsession over minimizing labor costs and chasing short-term financial targets, has created a fragile, inhumane, and uncompetitive system. Zeynep Ton proves that mediocrity is a choice, not a necessity.
The book leaves leaders with a profound challenge: to stop "worshipping the wrong god" of quarterly earnings and shareholder primacy. Instead, it calls them to have the courage to return to the fundamental principles of good management—serving customers and investing in the people who do the work. The real question isn't whether a company can afford to bet on its people, but whether it can afford not to.