
Upstart
11 minHow Uber, Airbnb, and the Killer Companies of the New Silicon Valley Are Changing the World
Introduction
Narrator: Imagine Washington D.C. in January 2009, during Barack Obama's historic inauguration. The city is electric, but also freezing and impossibly crowded. Lost in this sea of people are two separate groups of young, unknown entrepreneurs. One group, the founders of a failing startup called Airbedandbreakfast.com, huddles on the National Mall, having slept on their own air mattresses in a foreclosed apartment. They are there on a shoestring budget, handing out flyers and desperately seeking a break. Miles away, another pair of entrepreneurs, Garrett Camp and Travis Kalanick, are also struggling. After waking up late, they sprint through the frigid streets, frustrated by their inability to find a simple cab. Neither group knew it, but their respective miseries on that single day—one born from a lack of lodging, the other from a lack of transportation—were the very problems that would launch two of the most disruptive companies in history.
Brad Stone’s book, Upstart: How Uber, Airbnb, and the Killer Companies of the New Silicon Valley Are Changing the World, chronicles the explosive and controversial rise of these two titans. It reveals that their success was not just about a clever app, but about a new, aggressive, and rule-breaking mentality that defined a generation of technology companies.
The Nonstarters: Why Others Failed Where Uber and Airbnb Succeeded
Key Insight 1
Narrator: Before Uber and Airbnb became household names, the ideas behind them were not entirely new. Many other companies saw the same opportunities but failed to capitalize on them, and their stories reveal the unique DNA that made the upstarts so successful. Their failures were often rooted in being too idealistic, too civil, or too unwilling to fundamentally challenge the existing system.
Consider the case of Couchsurfing, a precursor to Airbnb. Founded in 2004, it was built on the romantic notion of connecting travelers and fostering cultural exchange. Its founder, Casey Fenton, was so committed to this vision that he registered the company as a nonprofit. He believed that exchanging money would dilute the purity of the experience. While noble, this idealism became a fatal flaw. Without a sustainable business model, the site was difficult to maintain, and it couldn't compete when Airbnb emerged with a pragmatic, for-profit approach that still offered a sense of community.
Similarly, in the transportation space, an app called Taxi Magic tried to solve the taxi problem years before Uber. But its strategy was to work with the existing taxi industry, integrating its technology into the old, inefficient dispatch systems. It was a polite approach that tried not to step on any toes. This civility doomed it. The taxi fleets resisted change, and the app was ultimately swamped by Uber, which chose to build its own network of drivers from scratch, completely bypassing the old guard. These "nonstarters" show that the success of Uber and Airbnb wasn't just about the idea; it was about the audacity to build a new system rather than politely asking to join the old one.
The Hustle is the Antidote: The Unscalable and Unconventional Path to Early Traction
Key Insight 2
Narrator: In their early days, both Airbnb and Uber were on the brink of failure, surviving not on brilliant strategy but on pure, unglamorous hustle. They embraced what Silicon Valley veteran Paul Graham called "doing things that don't scale," a hands-on approach that is often the key to finding a company’s first true believers.
For Airbnb, this was most famously demonstrated by a box of cereal. In 2008, deep in debt and with no investor interest, founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia needed cash. Seizing on the presidential election, they designed and sold limited-edition cereals: "Obama O's" and "Cap'n McCains." They hand-glued hundreds of boxes and sold them for $40 each, raising around $30,000. The stunt didn't just pay off their credit cards; it showed an investor at the famed accelerator Y Combinator that they were "cockroaches" who simply wouldn't die. This resilience, more than their business idea, got them accepted. Later, when they realized poor photos were hurting their listings, Chesky and Gebbia flew to New York, rented a high-end camera, and went door-to-door, personally taking professional photos of their hosts' apartments. It was an expensive, time-consuming, and completely unscalable act that directly led to a doubling of their revenue in the city.
Uber’s early hustle was just as scrappy. In 2010, Travis Kalanick needed someone to run the company, so he sent out a simple tweet looking for an entrepreneurial product manager. A man named Ryan Graves, then working at General Electric, saw the tweet and replied, "hire me :)." After a two-hour coffee meeting, Graves was hired as Uber's first CEO. It was an unconventional recruitment that proved pivotal in getting the company off the ground.
The Growth Hacker vs. The Playbook: Two Models for Explosive Expansion
Key Insight 3
Narrator: As they moved from survival to expansion, Airbnb and Uber developed distinct but equally aggressive models for growth. Airbnb relied on clever technical exploits, while Uber created a methodical, repeatable playbook.
Airbnb's breakthrough came from a strategy known as "growth hacking," pioneered by co-founder and engineer Nathan Blecharczyk. Recognizing that their target audience was on Craigslist, Blecharczyk reverse-engineered Craigslist's posting form. He created a feature that allowed Airbnb hosts to cross-post their beautiful, photo-rich listings to the visually stark Craigslist with a single click. This was a violation of Craigslist's terms of service, but it worked brilliantly. It siphoned a massive number of users from the dominant platform, driving exponential growth until Craigslist finally shut it down.
Uber, on the other hand, developed a ruthlessly efficient "launch playbook." To enter a new city, they would deploy a small, three-person team: a general manager to run the business, an operations manager to recruit drivers, and a community manager for marketing. This team would follow a precise set of steps, from analyzing local transportation laws to throwing a launch party with local celebrities. In New York, they refined this with the "SoHo strategy," concentrating their limited supply of cars in a few trendy neighborhoods to reduce wait times and create a feeling of reliability. This created a virtuous cycle of happy riders and busy drivers, allowing them to systematically conquer one city after another.
The Wartime CEO: Crisis as a Crucible for Leadership
Key Insight 4
Narrator: Both companies faced existential crises that forced their founders to transform from idealistic creators into what investor Ben Horowitz calls "wartime CEOs"—leaders who must make hard, decisive choices under immense pressure.
Brian Chesky's trial by fire came in 2011. First, a German clone company called Wimdu, backed by the notoriously aggressive Samwer brothers, launched a near-identical copy of Airbnb and began expanding rapidly across Europe. At the same time, a host's apartment in San Francisco was completely ransacked by a guest, leading to a PR nightmare dubbed "Ransackgate." The company's initial response was clumsy and insensitive. Under intense public pressure, Chesky had to evolve. He issued a heartfelt public apology, took personal responsibility, and launched the "Airbnb Guarantee," a million-dollar insurance policy for hosts. This crisis forced him to build a company that could handle the messy realities of the real world.
Travis Kalanick, already hardened by past business failures, was galvanized by Uber's first regulatory battle. In 2010, San Francisco officials sent Uber a cease-and-desist order, threatening to shut them down. For Kalanick, this was not just a legal hurdle; it was a declaration of war. The fight solidified his resolve and became a core part of Uber's identity: an aggressive insurgent fighting a corrupt and entrenched taxi industry. This confrontational stance would define Uber's relationship with cities around the world for years to come.
Travis's Law and the Inevitability of Conflict
Key Insight 5
Narrator: As Uber and Airbnb grew into global giants, they became too big to ignore and, in some ways, too big to regulate. They pioneered a new form of political power, weaponizing their user bases to fight legal and legislative battles. This principle became known as "Travis's Law": if a product is superior enough, its users will become a powerful political force to defend its right to exist.
Uber perfected this tactic in Washington, D.C., in 2012. When the city council proposed a rule that would have effectively killed Uber's low-cost service, the company fought back. It added a "D.C." button to its app that, when pressed, sent a pre-written tweet to the mayor and council members. The campaign flooded officials with messages, and the bill was defeated. Airbnb used a similar strategy in its hometown of San Francisco when Proposition F, a ballot measure that would have severely restricted short-term rentals, was proposed. Airbnb spent over $8 million on a political campaign, mobilizing its hosts and users to defeat the measure. These fights demonstrated that the upstarts were no longer just tech companies; they were powerful political machines.
Conclusion
Narrator: The central lesson of Upstart is that the rise of Uber and Airbnb was not merely the result of a good idea meeting the right technology. Their success was forged by a new, combative, and often ruthless upstart ethos. They were willing to operate in legal gray areas, pick fights with powerful incumbents, and prioritize growth above all else. They demonstrated that in the modern economy, disruption is not a polite request for change but a full-frontal assault on the old way of doing things.
The book leaves us to grapple with the legacy of this approach. While these companies unleashed a wave of convenience and economic opportunity for millions, their path was littered with social disruption, regulatory conflict, and ethical compromises. They changed the world, but Upstart forces us to ask a difficult question: Was the price of that change worth it?