
The Sanity of Insecurity
13 minGolden Hook & Introduction
SECTION
Michael: The relentless pursuit of happiness is a recipe for misery. All those self-help books, vision boards, and five-year plans? They might be the very things making you anxious and unfulfilled. Today, we explore a philosophy that says true sanity is found in embracing total insecurity. Kevin: Wait, so all my meticulous goal-setting and my color-coded calendar are actually hurting me? That feels like a personal attack, Michael. But I'm intrigued. What kind of upside-down world are we stepping into? Michael: It's the world presented in the provocative and enduringly popular book, The Wisdom of Insecurity by Alan Watts. Kevin: Alan Watts, right. He's that fascinating figure—started as an Episcopal priest of all things, and then became one of the key voices bringing Eastern philosophy, especially Zen, to a Western audience in the 50s and 60s. A pretty wild career change. Michael: It was. And he wrote this book in 1951, right in the thick of what poets and thinkers were calling the "Age of Anxiety." He saw a society reeling from world wars, desperate for certainty in a world that offered none, and he proposed this radical, almost paradoxical, solution. Kevin: A message for an age of anxiety. I’d say that’s more relevant now than ever. Our age is practically defined by anxiety. So, where does he start? How does he begin to unravel this knot? Michael: He starts with a concept he calls the "Backwards Law." It's the simple, maddening idea that the more you try to grab onto something, the more it slips through your fingers.
The Backwards Law: Why Chasing Security Makes Us More Anxious
SECTION
Michael: Watts uses a perfect, simple analogy. If you're in the water and you panic, desperately trying to stay on the surface, you'll thrash around, exhaust yourself, and sink. But if you relax, and even try to sink a little, your natural buoyancy takes over and you float. Kevin: Okay, I can see that with water. But how does that apply to something like happiness or security? It feels like if I don't actively pursue those things, I'll just end up miserable and broke. Michael: That's the conventional wisdom he's flipping on its head. He argues that our whole culture is built on living for the future. We endure boring jobs to earn money for a future moment of pleasure. We educate our children not for the joy of learning, but to prepare them for a future career. We are constantly preparing to live, but never actually living. Kevin: That hits a little too close to home. It’s like endlessly scrolling through vacation photos on Instagram, planning the perfect trip, but that future happiness is always just one more click, one more purchase away. The planning becomes the entire experience, and the actual vacation, if it happens, can't possibly live up to the hype. Michael: Precisely. Watts describes this as a cycle of increasing stimulation and decreasing sensitivity. We chase bigger and bigger thrills to distract ourselves from the underlying feeling that the whole enterprise is futile. The "good time" we're always chasing is a phantom, because when it arrives, our mind is already looking ahead to the next good time. We can't enjoy the meal because we're already anxious about the check. Kevin: So the anxiety isn't a bug in the system, it's a feature of this constant future-chasing. But what's the alternative? Are we supposed to just abandon all plans? Not save for retirement? Just live in a van down by the river? Michael: He's not advocating for irresponsibility. It's more about a shift in our psychological posture. The problem isn't the planning itself, but the belief that our happiness is located in the outcome of the plan. Watts saw that the traditional anchors of society—religion, family, government—were crumbling in the post-war era. People lost faith in a guaranteed heaven or a stable social order. Kevin: And science, which replaced it, gave us amazing technology but a cold, purposeless universe. It told us how things work, but not why they matter. Michael: Exactly. So we're left feeling adrift. We try to build our own little rafts of security out of money, status, or beliefs. But Watts says this is like a child trying to mail a parcel of water. You can't wrap it up. The more you try to contain the fluid, ever-changing nature of life, the more it leaks out, and the more frustrated you become. Kevin: A parcel of water. That’s a fantastic image. It’s impossible. So the very act of trying to make life secure and predictable is what generates the feeling of insecurity. That is the Backwards Law. Michael: That's it. And this leads to his deeper point. If the chase is the problem, we have to ask: who, or what, is doing the chasing?
The Great Stream: Dissolving the Illusion of 'I'
SECTION
Kevin: Okay, so the chase is the problem. But why are we all running this futile race? What's driving this deep-seated need for security in the first place? It feels instinctual, like a survival mechanism. Michael: Watts argues it comes from a fundamental illusion, a split in our minds. He says we experience a conflict between what he calls the "I" and the "me." The "me" is our total organism—our body, our feelings, our senses, this whole flowing, changing process of being alive. The "me" is part of nature. Kevin: And the "I"? Michael: The "I" is the idea of ourselves. It's the ego, the thinker, the controller. It's a product of memory and language. The "I" is a collection of memories, labels, and thoughts that we bundle together and call "myself." And this "I" looks at the "me" and gets nervous. It sees the "me" is mortal, gets sick, feels pain, and is totally unpredictable. So the "I" tries to control the "me." Kevin: Wow. So the "I" is like a nervous CEO who doesn't trust the company he's running. The company is the "me," the actual living organism. Michael: That's a perfect analogy. The CEO, the "I," wants permanent profits and predictable growth. But the company, the "me," is part of a dynamic, messy, unpredictable market—which is life itself. The "I" wants to fix life, to nail it down, to understand it completely so it can be controlled. Kevin: And that's where the conflict starts. The "I" is trying to stand apart from life to manage it, but it is life. Michael: Exactly. Watts uses the ancient symbol of the Ouroboros—the snake eating its own tail. That's the image of the "I" trying to control the "me." It's a vicious, self-consuming circle. The part of you that feels fear is the same part of you that is trying to run away from the fear. You can't escape yourself. Kevin: That is a head-scratcher. It feels true, but it's so hard to grasp. It's like we've confused the map with the territory. We've become so obsessed with our thoughts about reality—our labels, our definitions, our memories—that we've forgotten what it's like to experience reality directly. Michael: That's the core of it. He says we've forgotten that words and thoughts are just conventions, like money. Money is useful for exchange, but it isn't real wealth. You can't eat it. A community with all the gold in the world but no food will starve. Similarly, a person with all the thoughts and beliefs in the world but no connection to the present reality is spiritually starving. Kevin: It's like we're living in a spreadsheet of our life instead of the life itself. We're so busy analyzing the data points of past experiences and projecting future outcomes that we miss the actual, tangible present. Michael: And that obsession with the spreadsheet, with the fixed and the defined, is what creates the illusion of a separate, static "I." But in reality, there is no fixed "I." There is only the flowing, changing process of experience. There is only the stream. Kevin: Okay, this is where it gets both exciting and, frankly, a bit terrifying. If there's no fixed 'I', and trying to be secure is a trap, what are we supposed to do? How do we live in this 'Great Stream' without drowning? Michael: Well, that's the beauty of it. Watts argues that to find sanity, we have to stop trying to build a dam and instead learn how to swim. We have to plunge into the great stream of the present.
The Marvelous Moment & The Wisdom of the Body
SECTION
Michael: And that's the perfect way to put it. Watts argues that to find sanity, we have to stop reading the spreadsheet and actually plunge into the great stream of the present. This is where we get to the "wisdom" part of The Wisdom of Insecurity. Kevin: The 'how-to' section, finally! But I have a feeling it's not going to be a simple 5-step plan. Michael: Not at all. The 'how' isn't a technique; it's a shift in awareness. He tells a beautiful Taoist story to illustrate this. In a heavy snowstorm, the rigid branches of the pine tree collect more and more snow until their strength becomes their weakness, and they crack and break under the weight. Kevin: Right, I think I know this one. And the willow tree? Michael: The willow tree, with its flexible boughs, simply yields. It bends under the weight of the snow until the snow slides off, and then it springs back, unharmed. The willow survives not through resistance, but through surrender. Kevin: So, applied to our minds, when we're hit with a 'snowstorm' of pain, or fear, or uncertainty, our instinct is to be the pine tree—to tense up, to resist, to fight it. Michael: Yes. And that resistance, that tensing up, is what creates most of the suffering. Watts says pain is a given, but suffering is the result of our non-acceptance of pain. The real move is to be the willow—to yield to the experience, to let it be what it is without fighting it. Kevin: This sounds a lot like modern mindfulness, but with a more radical core. It's not just about observing your thoughts from a distance. He's saying you have to realize there is no 'you' separate from the thought or the feeling. When you feel pain, you are the pain. There's no one to escape. Michael: You've hit on the most crucial point. There is no thinker, only the thought. There is no feeler, only the feeling. The moment you stop trying to separate yourself from the experience, the struggle ceases. He tells a story of a Persian sage who knocks on the door of Heaven. A voice from within asks, "Who is there?" The sage replies, "It is I." The door remains shut. He meditates for years, returns, and the same thing happens. Finally, he returns a third time. The voice asks, "Who is there?" And this time, the sage cries, "It is thyself!" And the door swings open. Kevin: Whoa. Because in that moment of total unity, there's no room for a separate 'thee and me.' There's just... what is. That's a powerful story. It reframes everything. It's not about me conquering my anxiety. It's about realizing the 'me' and the 'anxiety' are not two different things. Michael: Exactly. And this is what he calls living in the "marvelous moment." It's not some mystical, spaced-out state. It's simply being fully present with reality as it is. It's trusting the wisdom of your body, your "me," which knows how to breathe, and digest, and heal without the "I" needing to supervise. The brain, when used correctly, should serve the present moment, not try to escape it. Kevin: It's a profound letting go. It's admitting that our conscious, planning mind isn't the star of the show. It's just one instrument in a vast orchestra. And its constant attempts to conduct are just making a racket. Michael: A perfect summary. The goal is to let the music play. To stop trying to capture the river in a bucket and instead, to feel what it's like to be the river itself.
Synthesis & Takeaways
SECTION
Kevin: So, after all this, what's the one thing we should really hold onto? It feels like the book systematically dismantles everything we think we know about how to live a good life. It's both liberating and, honestly, a little disorienting. Michael: That's exactly the point. The wisdom isn't in a new belief system to replace the old ones. The wisdom is in the freedom that comes from letting go of all fixed beliefs. It's the recognition that life isn't a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced. Kevin: I'm stuck on that line from the book about dancing. That the meaning of dancing is just... the dance. Michael: Yes! We don't dance to arrive at a particular spot on the floor. We dance for the sake of dancing. Watts is saying that life is the same. Its purpose isn't in some future destination—not in retirement, not in heaven, not in achieving enlightenment. The entire point of life is this very moment. Kevin: That's a powerful and, as I said, a little scary thought. It puts all the responsibility—and all the joy—right here, right now. There's no deferring it. There's no 'I'll be happy when...' Michael: There is only now. And death, he says, is the ultimate expression of this truth. Death is the final, non-negotiable proof that you cannot hold onto the past, that you must enter the unknown, and that the separate "I" does not continue. Embracing that truth now, in this moment, is the key to living without fear. Kevin: It's a total reversal of our normal way of thinking. We think we need to find security to be able to live freely. Watts is saying we need to embrace insecurity to live at all. Michael: So the question for all of us, the one Watts leaves us with, is this: what security are you clinging to that's actually making you feel more insecure? Kevin: That's one to chew on. Is it a belief? A relationship? A five-year plan? We'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Find us on our social channels and let us know what you think. Does this idea liberate you or terrify you? For me, it's a bit of both. Michael: This is Aibrary, signing off.