
Sun Tzu and the Art of Business
10 minSix Strategic Principles for Managers
Introduction
Narrator: On April 2, 1993, a day that would become known on Wall Street as "Marlboro Friday," Philip Morris made a seemingly logical decision. Facing pressure from cheaper, discount cigarette brands, the company announced a 20% price cut on its flagship Marlboro brand. The goal was simple: reclaim market share. The result was catastrophic. Competitors instantly matched the price cuts, triggering a brutal price war. In a single day, Philip Morris saw its market value plummet by $13.4 billion. The move, intended to strengthen the company, instead destroyed industry-wide profitability and ultimately led to the CEO's resignation. How could such a direct, aggressive competitive move go so disastrously wrong?
The answer, according to Mark McNeilly in his book Sun Tzu and the Art of Business, lies in a failure to grasp a strategic wisdom articulated over 2,500 years ago. McNeilly translates the timeless military philosophy of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War into a powerful framework for modern business, arguing that the greatest victories are won not through brute force, but through superior strategy.
The Supreme Goal is to Win Without Fighting
Key Insight 1
Narrator: Sun Tzu’s most profound principle is that the "acme of skill" is to subdue the enemy without fighting. In business, this translates to capturing a market without engaging in destructive, value-annihilating competition. The goal is to take "All-Under-Heaven," or the entire marketplace, intact, ensuring the company's long-term prosperity. Price wars are the antithesis of this philosophy.
The airline industry serves as a chronic example of this failure. Following deregulation, the entry of low-cost carriers like PeopleExpress triggered decades of relentless price wars. Major airlines, locked in a battle for market share, repeatedly cut fares to unsustainable levels. Between 1989 and 1993, the industry collectively lost $12 billion, over 120 airlines went bankrupt, and 100,000 employees were laid off. By trying to destroy their competitors through direct price confrontation, they nearly destroyed the profitability of the entire market. They won battles for passengers but lost the war for profits, failing to capture the market intact.
Avoid Strength and Attack Weakness
Key Insight 2
Narrator: If direct, head-to-head conflict is to be avoided, how does a company win? Sun Tzu’s answer is to be like water, which "avoids the heights and hastens to the lowlands." A business must avoid a competitor's strengths and strike at their weaknesses. Attacking a competitor where they are strongest is an inefficient, resource-draining strategy that often ends in failure.
The battle between Kmart and Wal-Mart in the early 1990s is a classic case study. As Wal-Mart expanded into Kmart’s urban territories, Kmart launched a direct, strength-on-strength assault. It invested $3 billion to revamp its stores and lowered prices on thousands of items to match Wal-Mart. However, Wal-Mart’s strength was its unparalleled, low-cost supply chain. Kmart was attacking the core of Wal-Mart’s power. The result was a resounding defeat. Kmart’s market share fell from 35% to 23%, while Wal-Mart’s doubled to 40%.
In contrast, Wal-Mart’s own rise was a masterclass in attacking weakness. Instead of initially taking on retail giants like Sears and Kmart in major urban centers, Sam Walton targeted small towns. His competitors were local Mom & Pop stores that could not compete with Wal-Mart's buying power and distribution. By attacking this undefended weakness, Wal-Mart grew into a behemoth, surrounding its larger competitors before they even recognized the threat.
Foreknowledge and Deception are Your Greatest Weapons
Key Insight 3
Narrator: To attack a competitor's weakness, one must first know what it is. Sun Tzu stressed that "foreknowledge" is the key to victory. This isn't about predicting the future; it's about obtaining detailed, specific intelligence on the enemy's plans, capabilities, and leadership. Without it, even a perfectly executed plan is worthless. The 1970 Sontay Raid during the Vietnam War, where U.S. special forces flawlessly executed a raid on a POW camp only to find the prisoners had been moved weeks earlier, is a stark military reminder of this truth.
Once you have foreknowledge, deception becomes your most powerful tool. "All warfare is based on deception," Sun Tzu wrote. The goal is to mislead your opponent about your true intentions, causing them to misallocate resources and create openings. In 1986, the British conglomerate Hanson PLC used deception brilliantly in its hostile takeover of SCM Corporation. After a series of bids and counter-bids, Hanson's leader, Sir Gordon White, abruptly withdrew his tender offer. Wall Street and SCM's management assumed the fight was over. But this was a feint. While his opponents relaxed, White secretly bought 25% of SCM's stock on the open market in a matter of hours, gaining a controlling position that ultimately led to a successful takeover. He feigned retreat to create the disorder needed to strike.
Shape the Battlefield Before the Battle Begins
Key Insight 4
Narrator: The most sophisticated strategists do not simply react to the competitive environment; they actively shape it to their advantage. This is achieved by employing both direct forces, which Sun Tzu called cheng, and indirect forces, known as ch'i. The cheng is the obvious, expected move that fixes the competitor's attention. The ch'i is the surprising, unorthodox maneuver that wins the battle.
When United Airlines launched its low-fare U2 program in 1994 to challenge Southwest Airlines in California, Southwest responded with a masterful combination of cheng and ch'i. The direct (cheng) attack was matching United's low fares on contested routes. But the indirect (ch'i) attack was far more cunning. Southwest simultaneously launched new flights targeting United's highly profitable long-haul routes, using its planes as bait to draw United's attention and resources away from the California price war. This indirect pressure forced United to defend its core business, limiting its ability to expand the U2 program and ultimately containing the threat. Southwest didn't just fight the battle; it shaped the entire war.
Leadership is the Lynchpin of Strategy
Key Insight 5
Narrator: Sun Tzu's principles are not a simple checklist; they require wise and effective leadership to implement. A leader must be a person of wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. Crucially, this means empowering subordinates while ensuring they understand the mission. Micromanagement is a sign of failed leadership. The case of Zenith Electronics in the early 1990s shows this clearly. After years of losses, the board put CEO Jerry Pearlman on a "short leash," second-guessing his every move. By restricting his authority, they were, as Sun Tzu wrote, "tying up the Black Hound of Han and then ordering him to catch elusive hares." The company continued to founder until Pearlman was replaced.
In contrast, the German Army in World War I developed a concept called Weisungsfuhrung, or "leadership guidance." Soldiers were not given rigid orders but were taught the commander's overall intent. This empowered them to think for themselves and take initiative on the battlefield to achieve the strategic goal. This level of trust and empowerment is the hallmark of a leader who can successfully execute a fluid, adaptable strategy.
Conclusion
Narrator: The single most important takeaway from Sun Tzu and the Art of Business is that strategy is not about out-muscling the competition, but about outthinking them. In a world that often glorifies head-on confrontation and brute-force tactics, Sun Tzu’s wisdom teaches that the path to victory is indirect, intelligent, and based on a deep understanding of both yourself and your opponent. It is a contest of wills and intellect before it is a contest of resources.
The book's most challenging idea is to unlearn our natural instinct for direct conflict. The real-world impact of this philosophy is profound: it offers a way to win markets, build lasting enterprises, and create value without resorting to the mutually assured destruction of price wars and other costly battles. The ultimate question it leaves for any leader is not "How can I beat my competitor?" but rather, "How can I shape the situation so that my competitor is defeated before the battle even begins?"