Aibrary Logo
Podcast thumbnail

Siblings Without Rivalry

9 min

How to Help Your Children Live Together So You Can Live Too

Introduction

Narrator: Imagine a home where the constant, grating sound of children fighting finally goes silent. Not because one child has won, or because an exhausted parent has yelled them into submission, but because they have learned to solve the problem themselves. Now, picture a different scene: two adult brothers, both suffering from the same kidney disease, arguing not over who is healthier, but over who is sicker, whose treatment is superior—a bitter competition that has defined their entire lives. These scenarios represent two sides of the same coin: the profound and lasting impact of sibling relationships, which can either become a source of lifelong support or a crucible of unending rivalry.

In their seminal work, Siblings Without Rivalry, authors Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish dissect this universal family struggle. They argue that the intense, often painful, dynamics between siblings are not an inevitable fate. Instead, they are a direct result of how parents handle feelings, comparisons, and conflicts. The book provides a powerful framework for transforming a home from a battleground into a training ground for empathy and cooperation.

Negative Feelings Must Be Acknowledged, Not Denied

Key Insight 1

Narrator: One of the most fundamental mistakes parents make is trying to suppress the negative feelings children have for their siblings. When a child screams, "I hate my brother!" the common parental response is to deny the feeling: "No, you don't, you love your brother." Faber and Mazlish argue that this denial is profoundly damaging. It teaches children that their feelings are wrong and unacceptable, forcing them to bury their anger and resentment, where it often festers and emerges in other destructive ways.

The authors illustrate this with a powerful exercise they call the "New Wife" analogy. They ask parents in their workshops to imagine their spouse coming home and announcing, "Darling, I love you so much, I've decided to get a second wife. She's younger and cuter, and I know you two will be the best of friends!" As the scenario unfolds—the new wife wears the original spouse's clothes, gets all the attention, and is constantly praised—the parents in the workshop express feelings of rage, jealousy, and murderous hatred. The exercise makes it painfully clear that the feelings a child has when a new sibling arrives are not monstrous or abnormal; they are deeply human. The solution is not to deny these feelings but to acknowledge them. A parent can say, "It sounds like you are so angry at your brother right now," or "It can be hard to share my attention." By accepting the feeling, without accepting harmful actions, parents give children a safe outlet, which is the first step toward managing those emotions constructively.

The Danger of Comparisons

Key Insight 2

Narrator: Comparing children is one of the most effective ways to fuel rivalry. Whether the comparison is favorable ("Why can't you be neat like your sister?") or unfavorable ("You're the smart one, and he's the athletic one"), it locks children into a competitive dynamic. Faber and Mazlish assert that children automatically translate the praise of a sibling into a personal criticism.

The lifelong damage of this is captured in the story of a woman who grew up with her sister, Dorothy. Her mother constantly held Dorothy up as the model of perfection, while the narrator was made to feel inadequate. This dynamic created a deep and lasting resentment. Even as an adult, the narrator found herself measuring herself against everyone she met. It was only through therapy that she understood the source of her insecurity. In a poignant phone call with Dorothy years later, she learned that the role of the "perfect" child was its own kind of prison. Dorothy confessed she was always afraid of getting close to her sister, worried it would disappoint their mother. This story reveals that in the world of comparisons, there are no real winners; both the "better" and the "worse" child suffer from being trapped in a role.

The Fallacy of "Equal is Less"

Key Insight 3

Narrator: The relentless pursuit of treating children "equally" is a trap. Parents who meticulously measure slices of cake or count presents to ensure perfect fairness often find it only intensifies the competition. The authors introduce the counterintuitive but liberating concept that "Equal is Less." Children, they argue, do not need to be loved equally; they need to be loved uniquely.

The absurdity of forced equality is shown in the story of a mother who, determined to be fair, took her daughter with beautiful, naturally curly hair to the barber to have it all cut off. Why? Because her other daughter had straight hair, and the mother felt it was unfair for one to have curls if the other could not. The result was not harmony, but a deeply hurt and resentful child who felt her unique quality had been sacrificed at the altar of a misguided principle. Instead of giving children the same, parents should focus on giving each child what they individually need. One child might need more time, another more physical affection, and a third more space. Meeting their unique needs, rather than providing identical treatment, is what makes a child feel truly seen and valued.

Freeing Children from Family Roles

Key Insight 4

Narrator: Within families, children are often cast into roles: "the responsible one," "the troublemaker," "the shy one," "the family clown." These roles, assigned by parents or even by the children themselves, can become self-fulfilling prophecies that limit a child's potential. Faber and Mazlish stress the importance of freeing children from these boxes.

A powerful story from the authors' own experience illustrates this. One of the authors had come to see her older son, David, as a "bully" and her younger son, Andy, as a "victim." This perception colored every interaction, and the boys' behavior seemed to confirm it daily. The turning point came after hearing a piece of advice from psychologist Dr. Haim Ginott: treat children not as they are, but as you hope they will become. One day, after David had pressed a hot spoon on Andy's neck, his mother resisted the urge to label him a monster. Instead, she sat with him and told him, "David, you have a superior capacity to be nice. Use it!" This act of seeing his potential, rather than just his transgression, was transformative. By refusing to see him as "the bully," she gave him the space to become someone else. The family dynamic began to shift, proving that parental perception has the power to either lock a child in a role or set them free.

Intervening Helpfully in Fights

Key Insight 5

Narrator: When children fight, parents often feel compelled to act as judge and jury, trying to determine who started it, who is right, and who is wrong. This approach rarely works and often leaves both children feeling misunderstood. Faber and Mazlish propose a different model of intervention, one designed to empower children to solve their own problems.

They outline a clear, multi-stage process. Level one is to ignore minor bickering, as children often can and should work it out themselves. If the conflict escalates, the next stage involves acknowledging the children's anger and reflecting their feelings. The parent might say, "You two sound furious with each other! You both want the same toy at the same time. That's a tough problem." The parent then expresses faith in their ability to find a fair solution and physically leaves the room. This communicates trust and gives them the responsibility to resolve the issue. Only when a situation is physically dangerous should a parent intervene forcefully by separating the children and stating, "It's not okay to hurt people. We need a cooling-off period." This method teaches conflict resolution by facilitating communication and compromise, rather than imposing a solution from above.

Conclusion

Narrator: The single most important takeaway from Siblings Without Rivalry is that parents are not referees in a lifelong competition; they are architects of the family environment. Their words and attitudes have the power to either build walls of resentment between their children or construct bridges of understanding. The authors' greatest challenge to parents is to shift their perspective—to stop seeing sibling conflict as a nuisance to be squashed and start seeing it as an opportunity to teach the most vital human skills: empathy, negotiation, and forgiveness.

By learning to listen to the feelings behind the words, to appreciate each child's unique qualities, and to trust in their capacity to solve their own problems, parents can give their children a gift far more valuable than a peaceful home. They can give them the tools to build a relationship that, despite its inevitable conflicts, can become a source of strength and connection for the rest of their lives.

00:00/00:00