
Redefining Fidelity
11 minA Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships
Golden Hook & Introduction
SECTION
Laura: A recent poll found that 22% of people have cheated on their current partner. That's nearly one in four. Sophia: Wow. That’s… a lot higher than I would have guessed. And a lot more depressing. Laura: It is. But what if the problem isn't a lack of willpower? What if the problem is the rulebook itself? Sophia: What do you mean, the rulebook? Like, the institution of monogamy? Laura: Exactly. That's the explosive question at the heart of Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships by Tristan Taormino. Sophia: I've heard this book is like the modern bible for non-monogamy. What's the story with the author? Laura: She is the perfect guide for this topic. Tristan Taormino is a long-time feminist sex educator with a PhD-level command of the subject, but she writes with such incredible clarity. The book is built on over a hundred in-depth interviews, so it’s less about abstract theory and more about real people navigating this messy, beautiful territory. It’s highly-rated for a reason—it’s incredibly practical. Sophia: So it's not just philosophy, it's a field guide. I like that. Let's get into it.
The 'Why': Deconstructing Monogamy and Redefining Relationships
SECTION
Laura: Well, Taormino starts by taking a sledgehammer to the biggest myth of all: the fairy tale of finding 'The One.' Sophia: You mean the soulmate who is your best friend, your lover, your financial advisor, your therapist, and your co-parent, all rolled into one perfect person? Laura: Precisely. The book quotes one therapist who describes this expectation perfectly. We expect our partner to be our "guru, my emotional crying towel, and my First Personal National Bank." It's an impossible job description. Taormino argues that this setup, this expectation of total fulfillment from one person forever, is what sets so many relationships up for failure. Sophia: That makes a strange kind of sense. When you put it that way, the pressure is immense. No wonder people crack. Laura: And they do crack. The book points out that the high rates of cheating aren't just a moral failing; they're a symptom of a system that doesn't align with human reality for a lot of people. Historically, marriage wasn't even about sexual exclusivity for most cultures. It was a practical, economic arrangement. This idea of a purely romantic, sexually exclusive lifelong bond is a relatively modern, and perhaps flawed, experiment. Sophia: Okay, but that sounds like an excuse. Isn't cheating just... cheating? A betrayal of trust? Laura: Here's the crucial distinction the book makes. Cheating is about deception. It's the lying and the breaking of promises that causes the pain. Consensual non-monogamy, which is what this book is about, is the polar opposite. It's built on radical honesty and negotiated agreements. Sophia: So it’s the difference between sneaking a cookie from the jar and agreeing beforehand that cookies are on the menu for everyone. Laura: Perfect analogy. And the book has this powerful story about a woman named Della. She was a leader in her community, in a committed relationship, and she cheated on her primary partner. It was a crisis. Sophia: I bet. That’s usually the end of the story for most couples. Laura: But for them, it was a beginning. They were both devastated, but they realized they didn't want to break up. So they sat down and had the brutally honest conversation they probably should have had years earlier. They asked, "What do we need? What do we want? And how can we build a relationship that allows for those things instead of pretending they don't exist?" Sophia: And what was the answer? Laura: They decided to explore polyamory. They used the crisis not to end their relationship, but to redesign it based on honesty. For them, non-monogamy became the solution to infidelity, not the cause of it. It was a way to repair trust, not shatter it further. Sophia: Wow. To turn a moment of betrayal into a foundation for a more honest relationship… that takes a level of emotional maturity that is, frankly, astounding. Laura: It does. And that’s Taormino’s core point. These relationships aren't for people looking for an easy way out. They require more communication, more self-awareness, and more work. You have to actively invent your partnership, because there’s no pre-written script to follow.
The 'How': A Spectrum of Openness
SECTION
Sophia: Alright, so if it's all about honesty and agreements, what does that actually look like? I feel like people hear 'open relationship' and just picture a 70s key party. Laura: That's a common misconception, and the book does a fantastic job of breaking down the huge spectrum of possibilities. It's not one thing; it's a whole universe of relationship styles. Sophia: Okay, give me the tour. Laura: At one end, you have what Taormino calls "Partnered Non-monogamy." This is often for couples who are emotionally and romantically exclusive, but erotically open. Their primary relationship is the sun, and everything else is a satellite. It's often about fulfilling specific desires. Sophia: Like what? Laura: The book gives some great examples. There's a gay couple who consider themselves monogamous, but they have an agreement that they can hook up with other men at the gym, as long as it's only mutual masturbation. For them, that doesn't count as 'sex,' so they call it 'monogamous with benefits.' Sophia: Huh. So they get to define what 'sex' and 'fidelity' even mean for them. Laura: Exactly. Then you have a style like Swinging. This is often more social and community-focused. Swingers tend to be couples who enjoy sexual experiences with other couples, often at parties or clubs. The book tells the story of Agnes and Raymond, a couple in their 50s who had been married for 20 years. Sophia: Let me guess, they were bored? Laura: Not exactly. They started sharing fantasies, and Agnes admitted she'd fantasized about being with a woman. So they decided to explore it together. Their first few experiences were a bit awkward, but they kept talking, kept checking in with each other. And they found that sharing these experiences, and the intense communication it required, actually made their own sex life and intimacy better. It was liberating. Sophia: That’s the opposite of what you’d expect. You’d think it would drive a wedge between them. Laura: For some it might, but for them, it strengthened their bond. Then, further along the spectrum, you get to Polyamory. This is where the focus shifts from purely recreational or erotic connections to having multiple significant, intimate, and often loving relationships. Sophia: This is where it gets really complicated, I imagine. Laura: It can, but the core idea is a rejection of the 'one person must be my everything' model. Polyamorous people believe you can love and be committed to more than one person at a time, just like you can love more than one child or more than one friend. It’s about emotional and romantic connections, not just sex. Sophia: So it's like, Partnered Non-monogamy is like having a favorite restaurant but getting dessert elsewhere. Swinging is like going to a food festival with your partner. And Polyamory is like having multiple favorite restaurants you love for different reasons? Laura: That's a fantastic analogy! And Taormino would say yes, and you get to decide what's on the menu, what the operating hours are, and who gets a reservation. There is no one-size-fits-all formula. Each relationship is custom-designed by the people in it.
The 'Heart': Navigating Jealousy and Compersion
SECTION
Sophia: This all sounds incredibly complicated emotionally. Let's talk about the green-eyed monster. How does anyone handle the jealousy? Laura: This is my favorite part of the book, because it reframes jealousy completely. Taormino argues that we treat jealousy like this monstrous, shameful feeling that we have to conquer or eliminate. But the people she interviewed had a different take. Sophia: Which is? Laura: One man, Owen, offers this brilliant analogy. He says, "I think of jealousy as the warning light on your dashboard. It tells you something is wrong, but it doesn't tell you what to do about it." Sophia: Oh, I like that. The light isn't the problem; it's just a signal. Laura: Exactly. When you feel jealous, it’s a sign to pull over and check the engine. Is the problem that you're feeling insecure? Are your needs for attention or affection not being met? Are you afraid of being abandoned? Jealousy is just the umbrella term for a whole host of other, more specific feelings. And once you identify the real issue, you can actually address it. Sophia: So instead of just yelling "I'm jealous!", you can say, "When you talk about your date, it triggers my fear of not being important to you anymore. Can we talk about that?" Laura: Precisely. It turns a destructive emotion into a constructive conversation. But the book goes even further, introducing a concept that feels like the flip side of jealousy: Compersion. Sophia: Compersion? I've never even heard that word. Laura: It's a term that's huge in the polyamory community. It means finding joy in your partner's joy. It’s the warm, happy feeling you get when you see your partner happy with someone else. Sophia: Honestly, that sounds like a superpower. Is it realistic for most people? It feels like an emotional black belt. Laura: The book is clear that it's not something you're born with. It's a learned skill. It comes from a place of deep security and trust. It’s about unlearning the idea that your partner’s love is a finite resource that gets used up on someone else. The book tells this beautiful story of Fiona, whose partner, Sam, developed a crush on a trans boy. Sam was nervous, questioning her own identity. Sophia: And Fiona was jealous? Laura: No. Fiona actively encouraged her. She told Sam, "You should explore this. This is wonderful." She was genuinely excited for Sam to have this new, happy experience. Sam said she was overwhelmed with how supportive Fiona was, and it allowed her to explore that part of herself in a way that felt honest and open, strengthening their bond. Sophia: So compersion is an active choice to celebrate your partner's happiness, even if it doesn't directly involve you. Laura: Yes. It's the ultimate expression of "If you love something, set it free." It's about wanting what's best for your partner, full stop. And while you don't need it for an open relationship to work, cultivating it can transform the entire emotional landscape from one of fear and scarcity to one of joy and abundance.
Synthesis & Takeaways
SECTION
Sophia: So, what this book is really saying is that the 'rules' of relationships aren't set in stone. We have the power to write our own, as long as the ink is made of honesty, communication, and a whole lot of self-awareness. Laura: Exactly. And it's not about being 'for' or 'against' monogamy. It's about being conscious. Taormino's ultimate message is that the most successful relationships—open or not—are the ones we actively choose and build, rather than the ones we passively fall into. It's the difference between being a passenger on a train and being the pilot of your own plane. Sophia: I love that. It’s about taking ownership of our connections. It makes you wonder, what's one 'unspoken rule' in your own relationships that might be worth questioning? Laura: A great question to reflect on. We'd love to hear your thoughts. Join the conversation with the Aibrary community online. Sophia: This is Aibrary, signing off.